few weeks ago, Eugenio launched a contest on his blog, Science in the XXI , which turned out to be the winner. The prize was a copy of his first popular science book. The fact is that I have in my hands from yesterday. In fact, I've read. This is what happens when one enjoys reading anything.
'The moon conspiracy scam go! " (Ed. Laetoli) is the title of the book and reviewed it, and forcefully removed, fifty of the defenders apolloescépticos hypothesis, those who believe that the man on the moon was staged. Do with it and read it, because it is a pivotal book in the battle of science against injustice. And it's fun. Eugene made a few foxes left the conspiracy theory and all its ideologues. Foreigners and English, and Santiago Camacho, a type capable of defending a week in the Fourth Millennium man did not Moon and the following Sunday, arguing that the ancient ruins recorded astronauts on the lunar surface. Crazy.
. Eugenio
removed the delusional hypothesis Conspiranoids first, and then lists the ten irrefutable proof that the man reached the moon. Since the lunar rocks (impossible to imitate, and supported by geologists from around the world) brought back to Earth, to the placement of mirrors on the lunar surface to measure the distance between the moon and our planet. The better and clearer, I agree with Eugene, is the silence of the USSR. If it had been staged, the first to denounce it had been them, engaged as they were in the space race. Pero no dijeron ni una palabra. ¿Tan tontos eran los soviéticos? ¿Cómo pudieron darse cuenta de que era un fraude un fotógrafo, un editor de prensa y un periodista, pero no los científicos soviéticos? ¿Fueron capaces de arrancar con ventaja la carrera espacial, pero se la colaron con la llegada a la Luna? Porque, además, no era ningún secreto y todos los telescopios del mundo estaban mirando esa noche hacia la Luna. También los de los científicos soviéticos. ¿Y se la colaron? Es completamente absurdo. Este argumento debería bastar, pero lamentablemente no es así.
.
Cuando se cumplen 40 años de la llegada del hombre a la Luna, este libro might seem as out of place. But the truth is still in force. If not, tell it to RTVE, which on its website (the truth, do not know if any parts have the same caliber television) is dedicated to fuel the conspiracy theory of lunar . It is the only way in which I found something similar. Everyone who has talked about the conspiracy theory have made it critically and making clear that it is a hoax. But this news gives some encouragement RTVE. So cryptic, yes, that ridicule is not of astronomical proportions. What they do is put the conspiracy theory on equal footing with the book or that Eugenio views of all serious scientists in the world. Talk about waving the flag, the stars are not visible on photographs, etc. Yes, provides a possible explanation, but only that, possible, as if it were not sufficiently documented or not to believe it was over. As if the scientific explanation of why the stars are not having the same validity as the hypothesis Conspiranoids. And it is because it is not opinion, nor to believe, but to meet the tests. And they are clear. Moreover, he dares to drop which is a shame that they are not stars, because it would be irrefutable proof, as if at this point were needed that. The rocks brought back from there, mirrors placed on the lunar surface, the silence of the USSR, more than 20,000 photographs ... all this is not enough for the journalist writing the story. For him, as there are stars, astronomers can not confirm this definitely. And, of course, it seems that is the question. The best thing is the beginning of last paragraph: "In short, come or not the man on the moon ..." Excuse me? The feeling left is: "There are people who say that there was no moon. There are others who say they do. You, readers, decide who believe." And again, the problem is that this is not a matter of faith.
.
is the tactic Some sellers of mysteries. Sell \u200b\u200bthe two alternatives from a distance, without getting wet, as if both had the same chance of being true, although one has been produced by a schizophrenic mind. It's what makes Fourth Millennium, for example, with each topic it touches. Instead of telling the truth, it's more fun to leave doubt in the air. Actually, not that more fun is that it is more profitable because the lies, half truths and systematic manipulation are what feeds them.
.
Therefore, because there are people willing to leave your brain fried others with mysteries fabricated and doctored photos are needed books like 'The lunar conspiracy, thymus go! ".
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment